The Monogram Murders(19)

“What is your name, monsieur?”

“Rafal Bobak, sir.”

“You served dinner to Harriet Sippel, Ida Gransbury and Richard Negus in Room 317 at fifteen minutes past seven yesterday evening?” Poirot asked him.

“Not dinner, sir,” said Bobak. “Afternoon tea—that was what Mr. Negus ordered. Afternoon tea at dinner time. He asked if that was all right or if I was going to force them to have what he called ‘a dinner sort of dinner.’ Told me that he and his friends were of one mind as not being in the mood for one of those. Said they’d rather have afternoon tea. I told him he could have whatever he wanted, sir. He asked for sandwiches—ham, cheese, salmon and cucumber—and an assortment of cakes. And scones, sir, with jam and cream.”

“And beverages?” Poirot asked.

“Tea, sir. For all three of them.”

“D’accord. And the sherry for Richard Negus?”

Rafal Bobak shook his head. “No, sir. No sherry. Mr. Negus didn’t ask me for a sherry. I didn’t take a glass of sherry up to Room 317.”

“You are certain of this?”

“Absolutely, sir.”

Being on display in front of all those pairs of eyes was making me feel a touch awkward. I was painfully aware that I had not yet asked a question. Letting Poirot run the show was all very well, but if I didn’t participate at all, I would look feeble. I cleared my throat and addressed the room: “Did any of you take a cup of tea to Harriet Sippel’s room, number 121, at any point? Or a sherry to Richard Negus’s room? Either yesterday or Wednesday, the day before?”

Heads began to shake. Unless someone was lying, it seemed that the only delivery to any of the three victims’ rooms was the one of afternoon-tea-for-dinner made by Rafal Bobak to Room 317 at 7:15 P.M. on Thursday.

I tried to sort it out in my mind: the teacup in Harriet Sippel’s room wasn’t a problem. That must have been one of the three brought by Bobak, since only two cups were found in Ida Gransbury’s room after the murders. But how did the sherry glass make its way to Richard Negus’s room unless transported there by a waiter?

Did the killer arrive at the Bloxham with a glass of Harveys Bristol Cream in his hand, as well as a pocket full of mongrammed cufflinks and poison? It seemed far-fetched.

Poirot appeared to have fixed on the same problem. “To be absolutely clear: not one of you gave a glass of sherry to Mr. Richard Negus, either in his room or anywhere else in the hotel?”

There was more head-shaking.

“Signor Lazzari, can you tell me please, was the glass found in Mr. Negus’s room one that belonged to the Bloxham Hotel?”

“Yes, it was, Monsieur Poirot. This is all very perplexing. I would suggest that perhaps a waiter who is absent today gave the glass of sherry to Mr. Negus on Thursday or Wednesday, but everybody is here now who was here then.”

“It is, as you say, perplexing,” Poirot agreed. “Mr. Bobak, perhaps you could tell us what happened when you took the evening-afternoon-tea to Ida Gransbury’s room.”

“I set it out on the table and then I left them to it, sir.”

“They were all three in the room? Mrs. Sippel, Miss Gransbury and Mr. Negus?”

“They were, yes, sir.”

“Describe to us the scene.”

“The scene, sir?”

Seeing that Rafal Bobak was at a loss, I chipped in with: “Which one of them opened the door?”

“Mr. Negus opened the door, sir.”

“And where were the two women?” I asked.

“Oh, they were sitting in the two chairs over by the fireplace. Talking to each other. I had no dealings with them. I spoke only to Mr. Negus. Laid everything out on the table by the window, and then I left, sir.”

“Can you recall what the two ladies talked about?” asked Poirot.

Bobak lowered his eyes. “Well, sir . . .”

“It is important, monsieur. Every detail that you can tell me about these three people is important.”

“Well . . . they were being a bit catty, sir. Laughing about it, too.”

“You mean they were being spiteful? How so?”

“One of them was, yes. And Mr. Negus, he seemed to find it entertaining. It was something about an older woman and a younger man. It wasn’t my business so I didn’t listen.”

“Do you remember what precisely was said? At whom was the cattishness directed?”

“I couldn’t tell you, sir, I’m sorry. An old woman that might be pining for the love of a young man, that was the sense I got. It sounded like gossip to me.”

“Monsieur,” said Poirot in his most authoritative voice. “If you should happen to remember anything else about this conversation, anything at all, please inform me without delay.”

“I shall, sir. Now that I think about it, the young man might have deserted the older woman and eloped with another woman. Idle gossip, that’s all it was.”

“So . . .” Poirot started to pace the length of the room. It was strange to see more than a hundred heads turn slowly, then turn back as he retraced his steps. “We have Richard Negus, Harriet Sippel and Ida Gransbury—one man and two women—in Room 317, talking cattily about one man and two women!”

“But what’s the significance of that, Poirot?” I asked.