Small Great Things(105)
Howard is still listing his finds. “I’ve got three ACLU memberships. And this girl ran a whole tribute to Eric Garner on her blog. A series called I Can’t Breathe Either.”
“Nice.”
“On the other end of the spectrum,” Howard says, “this lovely gentleman is the deacon of his church and also supports Rand Paul and advocates the repeal of all civil rights laws.”
I take the survey from his hand and put a red X through the name at the top.
“Two people who posted about reducing funding for welfare,” Howard says. “I’m not sure what you want to do about that.”
“Put them in the middle pile,” I reply.
“This girl updated her status three hours ago: Jesus Christ some chink just sideswiped my car.”
I place her survey on top of the Rand Paul advocate’s, as well as someone whose profile pic on Twitter is Glenn Beck. There are two candidates Howard has nixed because they liked Facebook pages for Skullhead and Day of the Sword. “Is that some Game of Thrones thing?” I ask, baffled.
“They’re white power bands,” Howard says, and I am pretty sure he blushes. “I found a group called Vaginal Jesus too. But none of our potential jurors listen to them.”
“Thank God for small mercies. What’s the big pile in the middle?”
“Indeterminate,” Howard explains. “I have a few pictures of people making gun gang signs, a handful of stoners, one idiot who took a video of himself shooting up heroin, and thirty selfies of people who are rocked-off-their-gourd drunk.”
“Doesn’t it just warm the cockles of your heart to know that we entrust the legal system to these folks?”
I’m joking, but Howard looks at me soberly. “To tell you the truth, today’s been a little shocking. I mean, I had no idea how people live their lives, and what they do when they think no one’s looking—” He glances at a photo of a woman brandishing a red Solo cup. “Or even when they are.”
I spear a Peking ravioli with my chopstick. “When you start to see the seedy underbelly of America,” I say, “it makes you want to live in Canada.”
“Oh, and there’s this,” Howard says, pointing to the computer screen. “Do with it what you will.” He reaches across me for a Peking ravioli.
I frown at the Twitter handle: @WhiteMight. “Which juror is it?”
“It’s not a juror,” he says. “And I’m pretty sure Miles Standup is a fake name.” He clicks twice on the profile picture: a newborn infant.
“Why have I seen that photo before…?”
“Because it’s the same picture of Davis Bauer that people were holding up outside the courthouse before the arraignment. I checked the news footage. I think that’s Turk Bauer’s account.”
“The Internet is a beautiful thing.” I look at Howard with pride. “Well done.”
He looks at me, hopeful, over the white lip of the paper carton. “So we’re finished for the night?”
“Oh, Howard.” I laugh. “We’ve only just begun.”
—
ODETTE AND I meet the next morning at a diner to cross-check the survey numbers of the potential jurors that we each want to decline. In the rare occasion when our numbers match (the twenty-five-year-old who just got out of a psychiatric hospital; the man who was arrested last week) we agree to let them go.
I don’t know Odette very well. She is tough, no-nonsense. At legal conferences, when everyone else is getting drunk and doing karaoke, she is the one sitting in the corner drinking club soda with lime and filing away memories she can use to exploit us later. I’ve always thought of her as an uptight piece of work. But now I’m wondering: when she goes shopping, is she, like Ruth, asked to show her receipts before exiting the store? Does she mutely hand them over? Or does she ever snap and say she is the one who puts shoplifters on trial?
So, in an attempt to offer an olive branch, I smile at her. “It’s going to be quite a trial, huh?”
She stuffs her folder of surveys into her briefcase. “They’re all big trials.”
“But this one…I mean…” I stumble, trying to find the words.
Odette meets my gaze. Her eyes are like chips of flint. “My interest in this case is the same as your interest in this case. I am prosecuting it because everyone else in my office is overworked and maxed out, and it landed on my desk. And I do not care if your client is black, white, or polka-dotted. Murder is remarkably monochromatic.” With that she stands up. “I’ll see you tomorrow,” Odette says, and she walks away.
“Nice chatting with you too,” I mutter.
At that moment, Howard blusters in. His glasses are askew and his shirt is untucked in the back and he looks like he’s already had about ten cups of coffee. “I was doing some background research,” he begins, sitting down in the chair Odette just vacated.
“When? In the shower?” I know exactly when we stopped working last night, which leaves little room for free time.
“So, there was a study done by SUNY Stony Brook in 1991 and 1992 by Nayda Terkildsen, about how white voters assess black politicians who are running for office, and how prejudice affects that, and how that changes for people who actively try not to act prejudiced—”